linux-kernel - [PATCH v12 07/10] soc: mediatek: Add extra sram control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1581910527-1636-8-git-send-email-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Feb 2020 11:35:24 +0800
From:   Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>
CC:     James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
        Fan Chen <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 07/10] soc: mediatek: Add extra sram control

For some power domains like vpu_core on MT8183 whose sram need to
do clock and internal isolation while power on/off sram.
We add a cap "MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO" to judge if we need to do
the extra sram isolation control or not.

Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
index 2a9478f..98cc5ed 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 
 #define MTK_SCPD_ACTIVE_WAKEUP		BIT(0)
 #define MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM		BIT(1)
+#define MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO		BIT(2)
 #define MTK_SCPD_CAPS(_scpd, _x)	((_scpd)->data->caps & (_x))
 
 #define SPM_VDE_PWR_CON			0x0210
@@ -57,6 +58,8 @@
 #define PWR_ON_BIT			BIT(2)
 #define PWR_ON_2ND_BIT			BIT(3)
 #define PWR_CLK_DIS_BIT			BIT(4)
+#define PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT		BIT(5)
+#define PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT		BIT(6)
 
 #define PWR_STATUS_CONN			BIT(1)
 #define PWR_STATUS_DISP			BIT(3)
@@ -234,6 +237,14 @@ static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
 			return ret;
 	}
 
+	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO))	{
+		val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT;
+		writel(val, ctl_addr);
+		udelay(1);
+		val &= ~PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT;
+		writel(val, ctl_addr);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -243,8 +254,15 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr)
 	u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits;
 	int tmp;
 
-	val = readl(ctl_addr);
-	val |= scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
+	if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_SRAM_ISO))	{
+		val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_SRAM_CLKISO_BIT;
+		writel(val, ctl_addr);
+		val &= ~PWR_SRAM_ISOINT_B_BIT;
+		writel(val, ctl_addr);
+		udelay(1);
+	}
+
+	val = readl(ctl_addr) | scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits;
 	writel(val, ctl_addr);
 
 	/* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */
-- 
1.8.1.1.dirty