| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e42273c5-1528-73d1-7a1c-6cc4253ddf5c@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:22:24 -0800
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<cluster-devel@...hat.com>, <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
<linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/19] mm: Use readahead_control to pass arguments
On 2/17/20 10:45 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
>
> In this patch, only between __do_page_cache_readahead() and
> read_pages(), but it will be extended in upcoming patches. Also add
> the readahead_count() accessor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> ---
> include/linux/pagemap.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> mm/readahead.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> index ccb14b6a16b5..982ecda2d4a2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> @@ -630,6 +630,23 @@ static inline int add_to_page_cache(struct page *page,
> return error;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Readahead is of a block of consecutive pages.
> + */
> +struct readahead_control {
> + struct file *file;
> + struct address_space *mapping;
> +/* private: use the readahead_* accessors instead */
Really a minor point, sorry...what about documenting "input", "output",
"input/output" instead? I ask because:
a) public and private seems sort of meaningless here: even in this initial
patch, the code starts off by setting .file, .mapping, and .nr_pages.
b) The part that's confusing, and that might benefit from either documentation
or naming changes, is the way _nr_pages is used. Is it "number of pages
requested to read ahead", or "number of pages just read", or number of
pages remaining to be read"? I've had trouble keeping it straight because
I recall it being used differently at different points.
> + pgoff_t _start;
> + unsigned int _nr_pages;
> +};
> +
> +/* The number of pages in this readahead block */
> +static inline unsigned int readahead_count(struct readahead_control *rac)
> +{
> + return rac->_nr_pages;
> +}
I took a peek at the generated code, and was reassured to see that this realy
does work even in the "for" loops. Once in a while I like to get my faith in
the compiler renewed. :)
> +
> static inline unsigned long dir_pages(struct inode *inode)
> {
> return (unsigned long)(inode->i_size + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >>
> diff --git a/mm/readahead.c b/mm/readahead.c
> index 12d13b7792da..15329309231f 100644
> --- a/mm/readahead.c
> +++ b/mm/readahead.c
> @@ -113,26 +113,29 @@ int read_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping, struct list_head *pages,
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(read_cache_pages);
>
> -static void read_pages(struct address_space *mapping, struct file *filp,
> - struct list_head *pages, unsigned int nr_pages, gfp_t gfp)
> +static void read_pages(struct readahead_control *rac, struct list_head *pages,
> + gfp_t gfp)
> {
> + const struct address_space_operations *aops = rac->mapping->a_ops;
> struct blk_plug plug;
> unsigned page_idx;
>
> blk_start_plug(&plug);
>
> - if (mapping->a_ops->readpages) {
> - mapping->a_ops->readpages(filp, mapping, pages, nr_pages);
> + if (aops->readpages) {
> + aops->readpages(rac->file, rac->mapping, pages,
> + readahead_count(rac));
> /* Clean up the remaining pages */
> put_pages_list(pages);
> goto out;
> }
>
> - for (page_idx = 0; page_idx < nr_pages; page_idx++) {
> + for (page_idx = 0; page_idx < readahead_count(rac); page_idx++) {
> struct page *page = lru_to_page(pages);
> list_del(&page->lru);
> - if (!add_to_page_cache_lru(page, mapping, page->index, gfp))
> - mapping->a_ops->readpage(filp, page);
> + if (!add_to_page_cache_lru(page, rac->mapping, page->index,
> + gfp))
> + aops->readpage(rac->file, page);
> put_page(page);
> }
>
> @@ -155,9 +158,13 @@ void __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping,
> unsigned long end_index; /* The last page we want to read */
> LIST_HEAD(page_pool);
> int page_idx;
> - unsigned int nr_pages = 0;
> loff_t isize = i_size_read(inode);
> gfp_t gfp_mask = readahead_gfp_mask(mapping);
> + struct readahead_control rac = {
> + .mapping = mapping,
> + .file = filp,
> + ._nr_pages = 0,
> + };
>
> if (isize == 0)
> return;
> @@ -180,10 +187,9 @@ void __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping,
> * contiguous pages before continuing with the next
> * batch.
> */
> - if (nr_pages)
> - read_pages(mapping, filp, &page_pool, nr_pages,
> - gfp_mask);
> - nr_pages = 0;
> + if (readahead_count(&rac))
> + read_pages(&rac, &page_pool, gfp_mask);
> + rac._nr_pages = 0;
> continue;
> }
>
> @@ -194,7 +200,7 @@ void __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping,
> list_add(&page->lru, &page_pool);
> if (page_idx == nr_to_read - lookahead_size)
> SetPageReadahead(page);
> - nr_pages++;
> + rac._nr_pages++;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -202,8 +208,8 @@ void __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping,
> * uptodate then the caller will launch readpage again, and
> * will then handle the error.
> */
> - if (nr_pages)
> - read_pages(mapping, filp, &page_pool, nr_pages, gfp_mask);
> + if (readahead_count(&rac))
> + read_pages(&rac, &page_pool, gfp_mask);
> BUG_ON(!list_empty(&page_pool));
> }
>
>
In any case, this patch faithfully preserves the existing logic, so regardless of any
documentation decisions,
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists