lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200218063110.GO10776@dread.disaster.area>
Date:   Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:31:10 +1100
From:   Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
        ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/19] mm: Add page_cache_readahead_limit

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 10:45:56AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
> 
> ext4 and f2fs have duplicated the guts of the readahead code so
> they can read past i_size.  Instead, separate out the guts of the
> readahead code so they can call it directly.

Gross and nasty (hosting non-stale data beyond EOF in the page
cache, that is).

Code is pretty simple, but...

>  }
>  
> -/*
> - * __do_page_cache_readahead() actually reads a chunk of disk.  It allocates
> - * the pages first, then submits them for I/O. This avoids the very bad
> - * behaviour which would occur if page allocations are causing VM writeback.
> - * We really don't want to intermingle reads and writes like that.
> +/**
> + * page_cache_readahead_limit - Start readahead beyond a file's i_size.
> + * @mapping: File address space.
> + * @file: This instance of the open file; used for authentication.
> + * @offset: First page index to read.
> + * @end_index: The maximum page index to read.
> + * @nr_to_read: The number of pages to read.
> + * @lookahead_size: Where to start the next readahead.
> + *
> + * This function is for filesystems to call when they want to start
> + * readahead potentially beyond a file's stated i_size.  If you want
> + * to start readahead on a normal file, you probably want to call
> + * page_cache_async_readahead() or page_cache_sync_readahead() instead.
> + *
> + * Context: File is referenced by caller.  Mutexes may be held by caller.
> + * May sleep, but will not reenter filesystem to reclaim memory.
>   */
> -void __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping,
> -		struct file *filp, pgoff_t offset, unsigned long nr_to_read,
> -		unsigned long lookahead_size)
> +void page_cache_readahead_limit(struct address_space *mapping,

... I don't think the function name conveys it's purpose. It's
really a ranged readahead that ignores where i_size lies. i.e

	page_cache_readahead_range(mapping, start, end, nr_to_read)

seems like a better API to me, and then you can drop the "start
readahead beyond i_size" comments and replace it with "Range is not
limited by the inode's i_size and hence can be used to read data
stored beyond EOF into the page cache."

Also: "This is almost certainly not the function you want to call.
Use page_cache_async_readahead or page_cache_sync_readahead()
instead."

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ