linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 23/28] drivers: usb: Call cpu_latency_qos_*() instead of pm_qos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:08:46 +0100
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/28] drivers: usb: Call cpu_latency_qos_*() instead of
 pm_qos_*()

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 08:03:13AM +0000, Peter Chen wrote:
> On 20-02-12 10:38:27, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:28:44AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > > 
> > > Call cpu_latency_qos_add/remove_request() instead of
> > > pm_qos_add/remove_request(), respectively, because the
> > > latter are going to be dropped.
> > > 
> > > No intentional functional impact.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c | 12 +++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> With this patch applied, the usb-next can't compile pass.

Did I apply this?  It looks to need to go through Rafael's tree which
introduces the new api, right?

thanks,

greg k-h