[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a64bf17c015cb10e62d9c1a1ff64db5@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:46:10 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/20] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add initial SGI configuration
Hi Zenghui,
On 2020-02-18 07:25, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> Hi Marc,
[...]
>> static void its_sgi_irq_domain_deactivate(struct irq_domain
>> *domain,
>> struct irq_data *d)
>> {
>> - /* Nothing to do */
>> + struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> +
>> + vpe->sgi_config[d->hwirq].enabled = false;
>> + its_configure_sgi(d, true);
>
> The spec says, when C==1, VSGI clears the pending state of the vSGI,
> leaving the configuration unchanged. So should we first clear the
> pending state and then disable vSGI (let E==0)?
Right you are again. We need two commands, not just one (the pseudocode
is
pretty explicit).
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists