linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 05/34] ASoC: sun8i-codec: Remove incorrect SND_SOC_DAIFMT_DSP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1cdcbc0d-39c7-25f2-68eb-a44e815fb9b8@sholland.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:35:08 -0600
From:   Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
        Mylène Josserand 
        <mylene.josserand@...e-electrons.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/34] ASoC: sun8i-codec: Remove incorrect
 SND_SOC_DAIFMT_DSP_B

On 2/17/20 9:02 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:42:21AM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
>> DSP_A and DSP_B are not interchangeable. The timing used by the codec in
>> DSP mode is consistent with DSP_A. This is verified with an EG25-G modem
>> connected to AIF2, as well as by comparing with the BSP driver.
>>
>> Remove the DSP_B option, as it is not supported by the hardware.
>>
>> Cc: stable@...nel.org
>> Fixes: 36c684936fae ("ASoC: Add sun8i digital audio codec")
> 
> This can only break things for existing systems using stable, if they
> haven't noticed a problem with DSP B they'll certainly notice failing to
> set up the DAI at all without it.

Are you suggesting that I drop this patch entirely, or only that I remove the CC
to stable (and/or Fixes: tag)? Is this something that can't be removed once it's
there, or is the concern about making user-visible changes on stable?

Thanks,
Samuel