[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AG*AmQC6CEB-c3GeBiN1qKrE.3.1582021511507.Hmail.wenhu.wang@vivo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:25:11 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From: 王文虎 <wenhu.wang@...o.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wangwenhu <wenhu.pku@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, trivial@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, lonehugo@...mail.com
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] powerpc/sysdev: fix compile errors
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Date: 2020-01-21 16:37:07
To:"王文虎" <wenhu.wang@...o.com>,Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>
cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,wangwenhu <wenhu.pku@...il.com>,Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,trivial@...nel.org,Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,lonehugo@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/sysdev: fix compile errors>
>
>Le 21/01/2020 à 07:59, 王文虎 a écrit :
>> 发件人:Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>
>> 发送日期:2020-01-21 14:13:07
>> 收件人:wangwenhu <wenhu.pku@...il.com>,Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> 抄送人:trivial@...nel.org,lonehugo@...mail.com,wenhu.wang@...o.com
>> 主题:Re: [PATCH] powerpc/sysdev: fix compile errors>On 21/1/20 4:31 pm, wangwenhu wrote:
>>>> From: wangwenhu <wenhu.wang@...o.com>
>>>>
>>>> Include arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h into fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c to
>>>> fix the implicit declaration compile errors when building Cache-Sram.
>>>>
>>>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c: In function ‘instantiate_cache_sram’:
>>>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c:97:26: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ioremap_coherent’; did you mean ‘bitmap_complement’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>> cache_sram->base_virt = ioremap_coherent(cache_sram->base_phys,
>>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>> bitmap_complement
>>>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c:97:24: error: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
>>>> cache_sram->base_virt = ioremap_coherent(cache_sram->base_phys,
>>>> ^
>>>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c:123:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘iounmap’; did you mean ‘roundup’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>> iounmap(cache_sram->base_virt);
>>>> ^~~~~~~
>>>> roundup
>>>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: wangwenhu <wenhu.wang@...o.com>
>>>
>>> How long has this code been broken for?
>>
>> It's been broken almost 15 months since the commit below:
>> "commit aa91796ec46339f2ed53da311bd3ea77a3e4dfe1
>> Author: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
>> Date: Tue Oct 9 13:51:41 2018 +0000
>>
>> powerpc: don't use ioremap_prot() nor __ioremap() unless really needed."
>>
>> And we are working on it now for further development.
>
>That's pretty surprising. That commit didn't change the iounmap(). It
>only replaced ioremap_prot() by ioremap_coherent(). Both are defined in io.h
>
>Christophe
>
The compile error exists since the uploading of the driver
Details below:
1. "ioremap_flags" defined in "asm/io.h" was used primarily(Wed Oct 13 17:30:56 2010):
(6db92cc9d07d: powerpc/85xx: add cache-sram support);
2. "ioremap_prot" was used to replace "ioremap_flags"
(40f1ce7fb7e8: powerpc: Remove ioremap_flags);
3. "ioremap_coherent" was used to replace "ioremap_prot":
(aa91796ec463: powerpc: don't use ioremap_prot() nor __ioremap() unless really needed.)
So I will do the re-patch with a "Fixed" tag and "<linux/io.h>" include modification.
Which commit should be referenced to append to "Fixed" tag? (No.1 or No.3 ?)
Wenhu
>>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c
>>>> index f6c665dac725..29b6868eff7d 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c
>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>>> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>>> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>>>> #include <asm/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/io.h>
>>>>
>>>> #include "fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h"
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
>>> ajd@...ux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
>>>
>>
>> Wenhu
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists