linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/13] sched/numa: Use similar logic to the load balancer for moving between domains with spare capacity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:53:55 +0000
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:     Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] sched/numa: Use similar logic to the load balancer
 for moving between domains with spare capacity

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 05:59:15PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > Given that adjust_numa_imbalance takes the imbalance as the first
> > parameter, not a boolean and it's not unconditionally true, I don't
> > get what you mean.
> 
> My bad.
> 
> > Can you propose a patch on top of the entire series
> > explaining what you suggest please?
> 
> I just want to avoid splitting the pair of tasks on the src node as
> described by the comment in adjust_numa_imbalance() across two nodes
> despite idle cpus that are available on the dst node.
> 

Ah ok, so yes, this is something that needs to be done but it should be
a separate patch after this series is complete. It's very easy to get it
wrong and introduce regressions so I want to get the NUMA balancer and
load balancer reconciled first.

> If there are more than 2 tasks running on src node then try to migrate
> task to dst node in order to decrease imbalance.
> 

That should be happening already because 

	imbalance = max(0, dst_running - src_running);

I didn't take the absolute difference and excess tasks on the src should
still be able to migrate

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs