[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200218113116.GA4232@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:31:16 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
moderated for non-subscribers <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 18 (sound/soc/codecs/wm5110.c)
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:09:59AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> 1) We could update the machine drivers to do an imply as well,
> like the changes to SND_SOC_ALL_CODECS. I think this will
> generally work but doesn't really feel right as you can end up with
> the machine driver built without the CODEC.
Yes, that's not helpful.
> 2) We could update the machine drivers to a depends on and make
> the CODEC symbols manually selectable. I guess this also has the
> advantages that it would be necessary for the simple card stuff
> that seems to be everyones first choice for machine drivers these
> days.
That's not good, it means people have to know exactly what CODECs and
DAIs are on their board to even see the config option.
> Mark do you have any strong feelings on this I am leaning towards
> 2?
Why not just continue adding the relevant dependencies to the machine
drivers like we've always done?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists