[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200218123135.5iihagj3lkwx4h52@steredhat>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:31:35 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: remove unnecessary NULL checks
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 05:39:45PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The "kmsg" pointer can't be NULL and we have already dereferenced it so
> a check here would be useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---
> fs/io_uring.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 72bc378edebc..e9f339453ddb 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -3065,7 +3065,7 @@ static int io_sendmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
> if (req->io)
> return -EAGAIN;
> if (io_alloc_async_ctx(req)) {
> - if (kmsg && kmsg->iov != kmsg->fast_iov)
> + if (kmsg->iov != kmsg->fast_iov)
> kfree(kmsg->iov);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> @@ -3219,7 +3219,7 @@ static int io_recvmsg(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt,
> if (req->io)
> return -EAGAIN;
> if (io_alloc_async_ctx(req)) {
> - if (kmsg && kmsg->iov != kmsg->fast_iov)
> + if (kmsg->iov != kmsg->fast_iov)
> kfree(kmsg->iov);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
Make sense.
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Thanks,
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists