[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f820379-c58e-05fb-1745-28f2ed62d5ed@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:42:08 +0100
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Parth Shah <parth@...ux.ibm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] sched/numa: Replace runnable_load_avg by load_avg
On 18/02/2020 15:17, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 14:51, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 01:37:45PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>>> On 14/02/2020 16:27, Vincent Guittot wrote:
[...]
>>> -static void update_numa_stats(struct task_numa_env *env,
>>> +static void update_numa_stats(unsigned int imbalance_pct,
>>> struct numa_stats *ns, int nid)
>>>
>>> - update_numa_stats(&env, &env.src_stats, env.src_nid);
>>> + update_numa_stats(env.imbalance_pct, &env.src_stats, env.src_nid);
>>>
>>
>> You'd also have to pass in env->p and while it could be done, I do not
>> think its worthwhile.
>
> I agree
Ah, another patch in Mel's patch-set:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200217104402.11643-11-mgorman@techsingularity.net
I see.
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists