lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:29:44 +0100
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] KVM: X86: Less kvmclock sync induced vmexits after VM boots

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:

> On 18/02/20 15:54, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>> -	schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work,
>>> -					KVMCLOCK_SYNC_PERIOD);
>>> +	if (vcpu->vcpu_idx == 0)
>>> +		schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work,
>>> +						KVMCLOCK_SYNC_PERIOD);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> Forgive me my ignorance, I was under the impression
>> schedule_delayed_work() doesn't do anything if the work is already
>> queued (see queue_delayed_work_on()) and we seem to be scheduling the
>> same work (&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work) which is per-kvm (not
>> per-vcpu).
>
> No, it executes after 5 minutes.  I agree that the patch shouldn't be
> really necessary, though you do save on cacheline bouncing due to
> test_and_set_bit.
>

True, but the changelog should probably be updated then.

-- 
Vitaly

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ