[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <daf58c35-c240-e50a-da50-48b14c0e097c@st.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:31:30 +0100
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC: <od@...c.me>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] remoteproc: Add prepare/unprepare callbacks
Hi Paul,
I still wonder about the use of pm_runtime mechanism as a more generic alternative...
Else just a minor remark inline.
On 2/11/20 3:26 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> The .prepare() callback is called before the firmware is loaded to
> memory. This is useful for instance in the case where some setup is
> required for the memory to be accessible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2-v4: No change
> v5: Move calls to prepare/unprepare to rproc_fw_boot/rproc_shutdown
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index fe5c7a2f9767..022b927e176b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1373,6 +1373,14 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>
> dev_info(dev, "Booting fw image %s, size %zd\n", name, fw->size);
>
> + if (rproc->ops->prepare) {
> + ret = rproc->ops->prepare(rproc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to prepare rproc: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> /*
> * if enabling an IOMMU isn't relevant for this rproc, this is
> * just a nop
> @@ -1380,7 +1388,7 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> ret = rproc_enable_iommu(rproc);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "can't enable iommu: %d\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> + goto unprepare_rproc;
> }
>
> rproc->bootaddr = rproc_get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
> @@ -1424,6 +1432,9 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
> disable_iommu:
> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
> +unprepare_rproc:
> + if (rproc->ops->unprepare)
> + rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1823,6 +1834,9 @@ void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>
> rproc_disable_iommu(rproc);
>
> + if (rproc->ops->unprepare)
> + rproc->ops->unprepare(rproc);
> +
> /* Free the copy of the resource table */
> kfree(rproc->cached_table);
> rproc->cached_table = NULL;
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 5f201f0c86c3..a6272d1ba384 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
>
> /**
> * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
> + * @prepare: prepare the device for power up (before the firmware is loaded)
> + * @unprepare: unprepare the device after it is stopped
Would be nice here to precise that these functions are optional
you can look at rproc_ops struct for example.
Regards,
Arnaud
> * @start: power on the device and boot it
> * @stop: power off the device
> * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
> @@ -371,6 +373,8 @@ enum rsc_handling_status {
> * @get_boot_addr: get boot address to entry point specified in firmware
> */
> struct rproc_ops {
> + int (*prepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> + void (*unprepare)(struct rproc *rproc);
> int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
> int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
> void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists