Message-ID: <CAJMQK-j8w5++R-CCAVVupba96JRVJ+O91J=O-MT3nep+rx1Yzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:52:19 +0800
From:   Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
To:     Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>
Cc:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] random: rng-seed source is utf-8

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:01 AM Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/14/20 4:53 PM, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:55:36PM -0800, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
> >>> This is why I really think what gets specified via the boot command
> >>> line, or bootconfig, should specify the bits of entropy and the
> >>> entropy seed *separately*, so it can be specified explicitly, instead
> >>> of assuming that *everyone knows* that rng-seed is either (a) a binary
> >>> string, or (b) utf-8, or (c) a hex string.  The fact is, everyone does
> >>> *not* know, or everyone will have a different implementation, which
> >>> everyone will say is *obviously* the only way to go....
> >>>
> >> Given that the valid option are between 4 (hex), 6 (utf-8) or 8 (binary), we
> >> can either split the difference and accept 6; or take a pass at the values
> >> and determine which of the set they belong to [0-9a-fA-F], [!-~] or
> >> [\000-\377]  nor need to separately specify.
> > So let's split this up into separate issues.  First of all, from an
> > architectural issue, I really think we need to change
> > add_bootloader_randomness() in drivers/char/random.c so it looks like this:
> >
> > void add_bootloader_randomness(const void *buf, unsigned int size, unsigned int entropy_bits)
> >
> > That's because this is a general function that could be used by any
> > number of bootloaders.  For example, for the UEFI bootloader, it can
> > use the UEFI call that will return binary bits.  Some other bootloader
> > might use utf-8, etc.  So it would be an abstraction violation to have
> > code in drivers/char/random.c make assumption about how a particular
> > bootloader might be behaving.
> >
> > The second question is we are going to be parsing an rng_seed
> > parameter it shows up in bootconfig or in the boot command line, how
> > do we decide how many bits of entropy it actually has.  The advantage
> > of using the boot command line is we don't need to change the rest of
> > the bootloader ecosystem.  But that's also a massive weakness, since
> > apparently some people are already using it, and perhaps not in the
> > same way.
> >
> > So what I'd really prefer is if we use something new, and we define it
> > in a way that makes as close as possible to "impossible to misuse".
> > (See Rusty Russell's API design manifesto[1]).  So I'm going to
> > propose something different.  Let's use something new, say
> > entropy_seed_hex, and let's say that it *must* be a hex string:
> >
> >      entropy_seed_hex=7337db91a4824e3480ba6d2dfaa60bec
> >
> > If it is not a valid hex string, it gets zero entropy credit.
> >
> > I don't think we really need to worry about efficient encoding of the
> > seed, since 256 bits is only 64 characters using a hex string.  An
> > whether it's 32 characters or 64 characters, the max command line
> > string is 32k, so it's probably not worth it to try to do something
> > more complex.  (And only 128 bits is needed to declare the CRNG to be
> > fully initialized, in which case we're talking about 16 characters
> > versus 32 charaters.)
> >
> > [1] http://sweng.the-davies.net/Home/rustys-api-design-manifesto
> >
> >                                               - Ted
> >
> I am additionally concerned about add_bootloader_randomness() because it
> is possible for it to sleep because of add_hwgenerator_randomness() as
> once it hits the entropy threshold. As-is it can not be used inside
> start_kernel() because the sleep would result in a kernel panic, and I
> suspect its use inside early_init_dt_scan_chosen() for the commit "fdt:
> add support for rng-seed" might also be problematic since it is
> effectively called underneath start_kernel() is it not?
>
> If add_bootloader_randomness was rewritten to call
> add_device_randomness() always, and when trusted also called the
> functionality of the new credit_trusted_entropy_bits (no longer needing
> to be exported if so), then the function could be used in both
> start_kernel() and early_init_dt_scan_chosen().
>
I tested 64 bytes rng-seed previously so didn't hit the threshold that
makes it suspend. Thanks for pointing this out.
+1 for changing the add_bootloader_randomness() function as you
suggested to avoid this issue. But besides credit_entropy_bits(), they
are also different on crng_init (crng_fast_load/crng_slow_load).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists