linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] iommu/vt-d: Move deferred device attachment into helper function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:16:17 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, jroedel@...e.de,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] iommu/vt-d: Move deferred device attachment into
 helper function

> +static void do_deferred_attach(struct device *dev)
>  {
> +	struct iommu_domain *domain;
>  
> +	dev->archdata.iommu = NULL;
> +	domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
> +	if (domain)
> +		intel_iommu_attach_device(domain, dev);
> +}
> +
> +static struct dmar_domain *deferred_attach_domain(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	if (unlikely(attach_deferred(dev)))
> +		do_deferred_attach(dev);
>  
>  	return find_domain(dev);
>  }

Can we start using proper sybmbol prefixes and avoid do_* names where
possible?