linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] sched/numa: Replace runnable_load_avg by load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e173d020-2650-d2db-1e23-7ad71fd49a6c@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:54:29 +0000
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pauld@...hat.com,
        parth@...ux.ibm.com, hdanton@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] sched/numa: Replace runnable_load_avg by load_avg

On 18/02/2020 17:41, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>> I didn't merge that part of the first version of my series. I was
>>> waiting to see how the implementation for allowing a small degree of
>>> imbalance looks like. If it's entirely confined in adjust_numa_balance
>>                                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Apologies if that's a newbie question, but I'm not familiar with that one.
>> Would that be added in your reconciliation series? I've only had a brief
>> look at it yet (it's next on the chopping block).
>>
> 
> I should have wrote adjust_numa_imbalance but yes, it's part of the
> reconciled series so that NUMA balancing and the load balancer use the
> same helper.
> 

Okay, thanks, then I guess I'll forget about any reconciliation for now
and whinge about it when I'll get to your series ;)