lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200218180705.GA24185@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:07:05 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/25] fs: Add zero_user_large

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 08:10:52PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>

Thanks

> > +#if defined(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) && defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)
> > +void zero_user_segments(struct page *page, unsigned start1, unsigned end1,
> > +               unsigned start2, unsigned end2);
> > +#else /* !HIGHMEM || !TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> 
> This is a neat trick. I like it.
> 
> Although, it means non-inlined version will never get tested :/

I worry about that too, but I don't really want to incur the overhead on
platforms people actually use.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ