[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200218183526.GB2665507@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:35:26 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Sudarikov, Roman" <roman.sudarikov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
bgregg@...flix.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
alexander.antonov@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] perf x86: Exposing IO stack to IO PMON mapping
through sysfs
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 05:35:36PM +0300, Sudarikov, Roman wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Could you please take a look at the patch set?
Could you please relax and wait? You sent this less than 48 hours ago:
> On 14.02.2020 17:01, roman.sudarikov@...ux.intel.com wrote:
For a subsystem that I am not the maintainer of, and for a totally
low-priority issue, for a feature that I don't have hardware to test it
for.
You now have moved to the back of my pending review queue:
$ mdfrm -c ~/mail/todo/
437 messages in /home/gregkh/mail/todo/
As you well know, Intel is already on my "short list of companies to
ignore patches from" as it is, so I am going to force the issue now and
REQUIRE you to follow the internally documented Intel rules on how to
send patches to Greg. Hint, how you did it is _not_ how I have required
for it to happen. No idea how this snuck through my filters, I need to
go fix that up...
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists