[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <857c8dc6-d09c-423e-c520-53bb85c6d46c@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:25:56 -0800
From: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: zohar@...ux.ibm.com, joe@...ches.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sashal@...nel.org, nramas@...ux.microsoft.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] IMA: Update KBUILD_MODNAME for IMA files to ima
Hi Mimi,
On 2020-02-14 5:47 p.m., Tushar Sugandhi wrote:
> The kbuild Makefile specifies object files for vmlinux in the $(obj-y)
> lists. These lists depend on the kernel configuration[1].
>
> The kbuild Makefile for IMA combines the object files for IMA into a
> single object file namely ima.o. All the object files for IMA should be
> combined into ima.o. But certain object files are being added to their
> own $(obj-y). This results in the log messages from those modules getting
> prefixed with their respective base file name, instead of "ima". This is
> inconsistent with the log messages from the IMA modules that are combined
> into ima.o.
>
> This change fixes the above issue.
>
> [1] Documentation\kbuild\makefiles.rst
>
Is there any feedback on this patch description?
I can address it in the next iteration.
Thanks,
Tushar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists