linux-kernel - Re: [for-next][PATCH 04/26] bootconfig: Add Extra Boot Config support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200218193850.GM14449@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:38:50 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 04/26] bootconfig: Add Extra Boot Config support

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:57:48PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> OK, what if we put it as default 'n' but we still check if "bootconfig"
> is on the command line. And if it is, we warn with something like:
> 
> #ifndef CONFIG_BOOTCONFIG
> 	pr_err("WARNING: 'bootconfig' found on the kernel command line but CONFIG_BOOTCONFIG is not set in this kernel\n");
> #endif

Sure, makes sense to me. And all the code that requires it, can simply
select BOOTCONFIG.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette