linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 33/66] s390/uv: Fix handling of length extensions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200218190431.133878860@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Feb 2020 20:55:00 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 33/66] s390/uv: Fix handling of length extensions

From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>

commit 27dc0700c3be7c681cea03c5230b93d02f623492 upstream.

The query parameter block might contain additional information and can
be extended in the future. If the size of the block does not suffice we
get an error code of rc=0x100.  The buffer will contain all information
up to the specified size and the hypervisor/guest simply do not need the
additional information as they do not know about the new data.  That
means that we can (and must) accept rc=0x100 as success.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Fixes: 5abb9351dfd9 ("s390/uv: introduce guest side ultravisor code")
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/s390/boot/uv.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/s390/boot/uv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/boot/uv.c
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ void uv_query_info(void)
 	if (!test_facility(158))
 		return;
 
-	if (uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb))
+	/* rc==0x100 means that there is additional data we do not process */
+	if (uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb) && uvcb.header.rc != 0x100)
 		return;
 
 	if (test_bit_inv(BIT_UVC_CMD_SET_SHARED_ACCESS, (unsigned long *)uvcb.inst_calls_list) &&