[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200219164356.GB2935@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:43:56 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...nel.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, gustavo@...eddedor.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, josh@...htriplett.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
luto@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, frederic@...nel.org,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, mhiramat@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/22] tracing: Remove regular RCU context for
_rcuidle tracepoints (again)
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:47:37PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Effectively revert commit 865e63b04e9b2 ("tracing: Add back in
> rcu_irq_enter/exit_irqson() for rcuidle tracepoints") now that we've
> taught perf how to deal with not having an RCU context provided.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> include/linux/tracepoint.h | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> @@ -179,10 +179,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepo
Shouldn't we also get rid of this line above?
int __maybe_unused __idx = 0; \
Thanx, Paul
> * For rcuidle callers, use srcu since sched-rcu \
> * doesn't work from the idle path. \
> */ \
> - if (rcuidle) { \
> + if (rcuidle) \
> __idx = srcu_read_lock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu);\
> - rcu_irq_enter_irqsave(); \
> - } \
> \
> it_func_ptr = rcu_dereference_raw((tp)->funcs); \
> \
> @@ -194,10 +192,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepo
> } while ((++it_func_ptr)->func); \
> } \
> \
> - if (rcuidle) { \
> - rcu_irq_exit_irqsave(); \
> + if (rcuidle) \
> srcu_read_unlock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu, __idx);\
> - } \
> \
> preempt_enable_notrace(); \
> } while (0)
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists