[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200219164736.GL18400@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:47:36 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...nel.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, gustavo@...eddedor.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, josh@...htriplett.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
luto@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, frederic@...nel.org,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, mhiramat@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/22] tracing: Remove regular RCU context for
_rcuidle tracepoints (again)
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 08:43:56AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:47:37PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Effectively revert commit 865e63b04e9b2 ("tracing: Add back in
> > rcu_irq_enter/exit_irqson() for rcuidle tracepoints") now that we've
> > taught perf how to deal with not having an RCU context provided.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> > ---
> > include/linux/tracepoint.h | 8 ++------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> > @@ -179,10 +179,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepo
>
> Shouldn't we also get rid of this line above?
>
> int __maybe_unused __idx = 0; \
>
Probably makes a lot of sense, lemme fix that!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists