[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200219171309.GC32346@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 18:13:09 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...nel.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, gustavo@...eddedor.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, paulmck@...nel.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
luto@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, frederic@...nel.org,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, mhiramat@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/22] x86,mce: Delete ist_begin_non_atomic()
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:47:26PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/22] x86,mce: Delete ist_begin_non_atomic()
x86/mce: ...
> It is an abomination; and in prepration of removing the whole
> ist_enter() thing, it needs to go.
>
> Convert #MC over to using task_work_add() instead; it will run the
> same code slightly later, on the return to user path of the same
> exception.
That's fine because the error happened in userspace.
...
> @@ -1202,6 +1186,29 @@ static void __mc_scan_banks(struct mce *
> *m = *final;
> }
>
> +static void mce_kill_me_now(struct callback_head *ch)
> +{
> + force_sig(SIGBUS);
> +}
> +
> +static void mce_kill_me_maybe(struct callback_head *cb)
You don't even need the "mce_" prefixes - those are static functions and
in mce-land.
Change looks good otherwise.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists