linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] docs: add a script to check sysctl docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200219103305.733b7db9@lwn.net>
Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:33:05 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] docs: add a script to check sysctl docs

On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:25:27 +0100
Stephen Kitt <steve@....org> wrote:

> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only    
> > 
> > By Documentation/process/license-rules.rst, that should be "GPL-2.0"; the
> > absence of a "+" means "only".  
> 
> Ah, thanks, I hadn’t noticed that. I’m used to the SPDX identifiers listed on
> the LF website, https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html in this case.
> (I’m not alone apparently, see “git grep GPL-2.0-only”...)

The SPDX tags got changed at some point, but the kernel community
declined to follow along.  We're being difficult as usual...:)

Thanks,

jon