lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200219190423.GN2935@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:04:23 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kirill@...temov.name, elver@...gle.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] fork: annotate a data race in vm_area_dup()

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:28:15AM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> struct vm_area_struct could be accessed concurrently as noticed by
> KCSAN,
> 
>  write to 0xffff9cf8bba08ad8 of 8 bytes by task 14263 on cpu 35:
>   vma_interval_tree_insert+0x101/0x150:
>   rb_insert_augmented_cached at include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h:58
>   (inlined by) vma_interval_tree_insert at mm/interval_tree.c:23
>   __vma_link_file+0x6e/0xe0
>   __vma_link_file at mm/mmap.c:629
>   vma_link+0xa2/0x120
>   mmap_region+0x753/0xb90
>   do_mmap+0x45c/0x710
>   vm_mmap_pgoff+0xc0/0x130
>   ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d1/0x300
>   __x64_sys_mmap+0x33/0x40
>   do_syscall_64+0x91/0xc44
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> 
>  read to 0xffff9cf8bba08a80 of 200 bytes by task 14262 on cpu 122:
>   vm_area_dup+0x6a/0xe0
>   vm_area_dup at kernel/fork.c:362
>   __split_vma+0x72/0x2a0
>   __split_vma at mm/mmap.c:2661
>   split_vma+0x5a/0x80
>   mprotect_fixup+0x368/0x3f0
>   do_mprotect_pkey+0x263/0x420
>   __x64_sys_mprotect+0x51/0x70
>   do_syscall_64+0x91/0xc44
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> 
> vm_area_dup() blindly copies all fields of original VMA to the new one.
> This includes coping vm_area_struct::shared.rb which is normally
> protected by i_mmap_lock. But this is fine because the read value will
> be overwritten on the following __vma_link_file() under proper
> protection. Thus, mark it as an intentional data race and insert a few
> assertions for the fields that should not be modified concurrently.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>

Queued for safekeeping on -rcu.  I had to adjust a bit to get it to
apply on -rcu, please see below.  In my experience, git should have
no trouble figuring it out.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit 1228aca56f2a25b67876d8a819437b620a6e1cee
Author: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Date:   Wed Feb 19 11:00:54 2020 -0800

    fork: Annotate a data race in vm_area_dup()
    
    struct vm_area_struct could be accessed concurrently as noticed by
    KCSAN,
    
     write to 0xffff9cf8bba08ad8 of 8 bytes by task 14263 on cpu 35:
      vma_interval_tree_insert+0x101/0x150:
      rb_insert_augmented_cached at include/linux/rbtree_augmented.h:58
      (inlined by) vma_interval_tree_insert at mm/interval_tree.c:23
      __vma_link_file+0x6e/0xe0
      __vma_link_file at mm/mmap.c:629
      vma_link+0xa2/0x120
      mmap_region+0x753/0xb90
      do_mmap+0x45c/0x710
      vm_mmap_pgoff+0xc0/0x130
      ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d1/0x300
      __x64_sys_mmap+0x33/0x40
      do_syscall_64+0x91/0xc44
      entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
    
     read to 0xffff9cf8bba08a80 of 200 bytes by task 14262 on cpu 122:
      vm_area_dup+0x6a/0xe0
      vm_area_dup at kernel/fork.c:362
      __split_vma+0x72/0x2a0
      __split_vma at mm/mmap.c:2661
      split_vma+0x5a/0x80
      mprotect_fixup+0x368/0x3f0
      do_mprotect_pkey+0x263/0x420
      __x64_sys_mprotect+0x51/0x70
      do_syscall_64+0x91/0xc44
      entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
    
    vm_area_dup() blindly copies all fields of original VMA to the new one.
    This includes coping vm_area_struct::shared.rb which is normally
    protected by i_mmap_lock. But this is fine because the read value will
    be overwritten on the following __vma_link_file() under proper
    protection. Thus, mark it as an intentional data race and insert a few
    assertions for the fields that should not be modified concurrently.
    
    Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>

diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 60a1295..e592e6f 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -359,7 +359,13 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vm_area_dup(struct vm_area_struct *orig)
 	struct vm_area_struct *new = kmem_cache_alloc(vm_area_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	if (new) {
-		*new = *orig;
+		ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(orig->vm_flags);
+		ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(orig->vm_file);
+		/*
+		 * orig->shared.rb may be modified concurrently, but the clone
+		 * will be reinitialized.
+		 */
+		*new = data_race(*orig);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->anon_vma_chain);
 	}
 	return new;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ