linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: match parenthesis alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200219201913.GA2882443@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:19:13 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kaaira Gupta <kgupta@...iitr.ac.in>
Cc:     Vaibhav Agarwal <vaibhav.sr@...il.com>,
        Mark Greer <mgreer@...malcreek.com>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
        greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: match parenthesis alignment

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 01:26:51AM +0530, Kaaira Gupta wrote:
> Fix checkpatch.pl warning of alignment should match open parenthesis in
> audio_codec.c
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kaaira Gupta <kgupta@...iitr.ac.in>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
> index 08746c85dea6..d62f91f4e9a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int gbaudio_module_enable_tx(struct gbaudio_codec_info *codec,
>  		i2s_port = 0;	/* fixed for now */
>  		cportid = data->connection->hd_cport_id;
>  		ret = gb_audio_apbridgea_register_cport(data->connection,
> -						i2s_port, cportid,
> +							i2s_port, cportid,
>  						AUDIO_APBRIDGEA_DIRECTION_TX);

You can't do it for one line, and not all of the lines.

And if you do it for all lines, then you push past the line-length.

So you are back to what we currently have, which is the best we can do,
sorry.

greg k-h