linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu,tracing: Create trace_rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:45:10 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     paulmck@...nel.org
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        mingo@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        gustavo@...eddedor.com, tglx@...utronix.de, josh@...htriplett.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu,tracing: Create trace_rcu_{enter,exit}()

On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:18:06 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:46:09PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:33:35 +0900
> > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:31:12 -0800
> > > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >   
> > > > > BTW, if you consider the x86 specific code is in the generic file,
> > > > > we can move NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() in arch/x86/kernel/traps.c.
> > > > > (Sorry, I've hit this idea right now)  
> > > > 
> > > > Might this affect other architectures with NMIs and probe-like things?
> > > > If so, it might make sense to leave it where it is.  
> > > 
> > > Yes, git grep shows that arm64 is using rcu_nmi_enter() in
> > > debug_exception_enter().
> > > OK, let's keep it, but maybe it is good to update the comment for
> > > arm64 too. What about following?
> > > 
> > > +/*
> > > + * All functions in do_int3() on x86, do_debug_exception() on arm64 must be
> > > + * marked NOKPROBE before kprobes handler is called.
> > > + * ist_enter() on x86 and debug_exception_enter() on arm64 which is called
> > > + * before kprobes handle happens to call rcu_nmi_enter() which means
> > > + * that rcu_nmi_enter() must be marked NOKRPOBE.
> > > + */
> > > 
> > 
> > Ah, why don't we just say...
> > 
> > /*
> >  * All functions called in the breakpoint trap handler (e.g. do_int3()
> >  * on x86), must not allow kprobes until the kprobe breakpoint handler
> >  * is called, otherwise it can cause an infinite recursion.
> >  * On some archs, rcu_nmi_enter() is called in the breakpoint handler
> >  * before the kprobe breakpoint handler is called, thus it must be
> >  * marked as NOKPROBE.
> >  */
> > 
> > And that way we don't make this an arch specific comment.
> 
> That looks good to me.  Masami, does this work for you?

Yes, that looks good to me too :)

Thank you!


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>