linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] docs: sysctl/kernel.rst rework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200219034523.773492e6@lwn.net>
Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 03:45:23 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] docs: sysctl/kernel.rst rework

On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:59:15 +0100
Stephen Kitt <steve@....org> wrote:

> A recent discussion about differences in the "panic" description in
> sysctl/kernel.rst led me to look into completing that file, and it
> turned out that more work was needed than documenting "panic". This
> patch series is the first batch, making the resulting documentation
> hopefully nicer and more accurate. It doesn't add fields that are
> present in 5.5 but not documented; I've started adding these, but I'd
> rather submit them individually once the basic kernel.rst is
> committed, to make it easier to request review from the appropriate
> maintainers (each patch adding documentation should be mergeable
> separately, without needing a patch series).

OK, I've applied everything except #7, which I commented on separately.

Thanks,

jon