[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200219111913.GB32540@localhost>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:19:13 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] leds: trigger: implement a tty trigger
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:03:06PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:52:39AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:16:00AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > >
> > > Usage is as follows:
> > >
> > > myled=ledname
> > > tty=ttyS0
> > >
> > > echo tty > /sys/class/leds/$myled/trigger
> > > cat /sys/class/tty/$tty/dev > /sys/class/leds/$myled/dev
> > >
> > > . When this new trigger is active it periodically checks the tty's
> > > statistics and when it changed since the last check the led is flashed
> > > once.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > > ---
> >
> > > +static ssize_t dev_store(struct device *dev,
> > > + struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf,
> > > + size_t size)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ledtrig_tty_data *trigger_data = led_trigger_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > + struct tty_struct *tty;
> > > + dev_t d;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (size == 0 || (size == 1 && buf[0] == '\n')) {
> > > + tty = NULL;
> > > + } else {
> > > + ret = kstrtodev_t(buf, &d);
> > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + tty = tty_kopen_shared(d);
> >
> > I really don't have time to look at this, but having the led-trigger
> > keep the port open looks fundamentally broken (consider modem-control
> > signals, power, etc).
>
> If I understand correctly calling tty_kopen_shared() doesn't open the
> device, just keep it referenced which prevents it to disappear. Unless I
> miss something it doesn't result in the tty's .open() being called.
So tty_kopen_shared() is something you added. Judging from a quick look
it seems you can only attach a trigger to an already open port, but the
trigger will then keep the port open (again, consider modem control,
power).
I'm sorry I don't have time to review this myself, but this probably
needs some more eyes on it before being merged.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists