[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200219122004.GL2618@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:50:04 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: sprd: Replace zero-length array with
flexible-array member
On 14-02-20, 11:15, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
>
> struct foo {
> int stuff;
> struct boo array[];
> };
>
> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
>
> Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> this change:
>
> "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
Applied, thanks
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists