[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200219140216.GP3466@techsingularity.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:02:17 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pauld@...hat.com,
parth@...ux.ibm.com, valentin.schneider@....com, hdanton@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] sched/pelt: Add a new runnable average signal
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:55:13PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Now that runnable_load_avg has been removed, we can replace it by a new
> signal that will highlight the runnable pressure on a cfs_rq. This signal
> track the waiting time of tasks on rq and can help to better define the
> state of rqs.
>
> At now, only util_avg is used to define the state of a rq:
> A rq with more that around 80% of utilization and more than 1 tasks is
> considered as overloaded.
>
> But the util_avg signal of a rq can become temporaly low after that a task
> migrated onto another rq which can bias the classification of the rq.
>
> When tasks compete for the same rq, their runnable average signal will be
> higher than util_avg as it will include the waiting time and we can use
> this signal to better classify cfs_rqs.
>
> The new runnable_avg will track the runnable time of a task which simply
> adds the waiting time to the running time. The runnable _avg of cfs_rq
> will be the /Sum of se's runnable_avg and the runnable_avg of group entity
> will follow the one of the rq similarly to util_avg.
>
> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Thanks.
Picked up and included in "Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the
load balancer v4". The only change I made to your patches was move the
reintroduction of cpu_runnable to the patch that requires it to avoid a
build warning.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists