[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200219141730.GX2902@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:17:30 +0100
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Cc: yu kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>, clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com,
dsterba@...e.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhengbin13@...wei.com,
yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: remove set but not used variable 'parent'
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:34:53PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 19.02.20 г. 13:22 ч., yu kuai wrote:
> > Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
> >
> > fs/btrfs/tree-log.c: In function ‘walk_down_log_tree’:
> > fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:2702:24: warning: variable ‘parent’
> > set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> > fs/btrfs/tree-log.c: In function ‘walk_up_log_tree’:
> > fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:2803:26: warning: variable ‘parent’
> > set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> >
> > They are never used, and so can be removed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: yu kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>
> Ah yes, those two are a result of my :
>
> e084c5ab48f9 ("btrfs: Call btrfs_pin_reserved_extent only during active
> transaction") (in misc-next branch)
>
> David perhaps you can squash the two var removals into the original patch?
Yes I'll do that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists