[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200219150744.775936989@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:47:31 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, gustavo@...eddedor.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, paulmck@...nel.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
luto@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, frederic@...nel.org,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, mhiramat@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 07/22] rcu: Mark rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs() inline
Since rcu_is_watching() is notrace (and needs to be, as it can be
called from the tracers), make sure everything it in turn calls is
notrace too.
To that effect, mark rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs() inline, which
implies notrace, as the function is tiny.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void rcu_dynticks_eqs_online(void
*
* No ordering, as we are sampling CPU-local information.
*/
-static bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void)
+static inline bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void)
{
struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists