[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200219152614.GB3281@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:26:14 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: shawnguo@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 2/5] net: dsa: felix: Use
PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL instead of GMII
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:12:56PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
>
> phy-mode = "gmii" is confusing because it may mean that the port
> supports the 8-bit-wide parallel data interface pinout, which it
> doesn't.
>
> It may also be confusing because one of the "gmii" internal ports is
> actually overclocked to run at 2.5Gbps (even though, yes, as far as the
> switch MAC is concerned, it still thinks it's gigabit).
>
> So use the phy-mode = "internal" property to describe the internal ports
> inside the NXP LS1028A chip (the ones facing the ENETC). The change
> should be fine, because the device tree bindings document is yet to be
> introduced, and there are no stable DT blobs in use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists