linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 16/22] locking/atomics, kcsan: Add KCSAN instrumentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200219104626.633f0650@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:46:26 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        mingo@...nel.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, gustavo@...eddedor.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, paulmck@...nel.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
        luto@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, frederic@...nel.org,
        dan.carpenter@...cle.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/22] locking/atomics, kcsan: Add KCSAN
 instrumentation

On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:47:40 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> 
> This adds KCSAN instrumentation to atomic-instrumented.h.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> [peterz: removed the actual kcsan hooks]
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> ---
>  include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h |  390 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  scripts/atomic/gen-atomic-instrumented.sh |   14 -
>  2 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 192 deletions(-)
> 


Does this and the rest of the series depend on the previous patches in
the series? Or can this be a series on to itself (patches 16-22)?

-- Steve