[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_OJSHV5XotA6hORgQSrC4A-ZFzfXN_NRMGYFka+MTyjGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:52:32 -0500
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: drm_dp_mst_topology.c and old compilers
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 7:42 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> A box with GCC 4.8.3 compiler didn't like drm_dp_mst_topology.c. The
> following (lightly tested) patch makes it happy and seems OK for newer
> compilers as well.
>
> Is this of interest?
How about a memset instead? That should be consistent across compilers.
Alex
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index 20cdaf3..232408a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -5396,7 +5396,7 @@ struct drm_dp_aux *drm_dp_mst_dsc_aux_for_port(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
> {
> struct drm_dp_mst_port *immediate_upstream_port;
> struct drm_dp_mst_port *fec_port;
> - struct drm_dp_desc desc = { 0 };
> + struct drm_dp_desc desc = {{{ 0 }}};
> u8 endpoint_fec;
> u8 endpoint_dsc;
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists