[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200220195122.GL3926@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 19:51:22 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rewrite mtk-quadspi spi-nor driver with spi-mem
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 07:58:06AM +0800, Chuanhong Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 8:55 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > This is an ABI break so you shouldn't be doing this, if the existing
> > binding works it should continue to work.
> The missing spi-max-frequency is the only part preventing old
> device tree to work with this driver.
> If the goal is to make existing dt binding work, I could patch dt using
> of_add_property in v2. I saw similar device tree patching for legacy
> bindings in pinctrl-single driver.
That's fine I think, so long as old DTs continue to work.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists