[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200220145433.38ea92c9@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:54:33 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Skip software disabled event at
__synth_event_trace_end()
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:51:48 -0600
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 14:34 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:33:40 +0900
> > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > static inline void
> > > > __synth_event_trace_end(struct synth_event_trace_state
> > > > *trace_state)
> > > > {
> > > > + if (trace_state->disabled)
> > > > + return;
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Aah, I assumed that trace_state should be initialized with 0, but
> > > in really, it could be just allocated on the stack.
> > > We has to set trace_state->disabled = false in
> > > __synth_event_trace_start().
> >
> > Is this patch good enough to take, or is there another one coming?
> >
>
> I think this patch is good to take. The fix for setting trace_state-
> >disabled to false would be covered by this later patch:
>
> [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Clear trace_state when starting trace
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/158193315899.8868.1781259176894639952.stgit@devnote2/
>
Thanks Tom for the info!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists