[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200220145433.38ea92c9@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:54:33 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Skip software disabled event at
 __synth_event_trace_end()
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:51:48 -0600
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
> On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 14:34 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:33:40 +0900
> > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > >  static inline void
> > > >  __synth_event_trace_end(struct synth_event_trace_state
> > > > *trace_state)
> > > >  {
> > > > +	if (trace_state->disabled)
> > > > +		return;
> > > > +    
> > > 
> > > Aah, I assumed that trace_state should be initialized with 0, but
> > > in really, it could be just allocated on the stack.
> > > We has to set trace_state->disabled = false in
> > > __synth_event_trace_start().  
> > 
> > Is this patch good enough to take, or is there another one coming?
> >   
> 
> I think this patch is good to take.  The fix for setting trace_state-
> >disabled to false would be covered by this later patch:  
> 
>   [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Clear trace_state when starting trace
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/158193315899.8868.1781259176894639952.stgit@devnote2/
> 
Thanks Tom for the info!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
