[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h7zl9e7u.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:49:09 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Security Module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>,
"Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] proc: Mov rcu_read_(lock|unlock) in proc_prune_siblings_dcache
Don't make it look like rcu_read_lock is held over the entire loop
instead just take the rcu_read_lock over the part of the loop that
matters. This makes the intent of the code a little clearer.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
fs/proc/inode.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c
index 74ce4a8d05eb..38a7baa41aba 100644
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@ -110,11 +110,13 @@ void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock)
struct hlist_node *node;
struct super_block *sb;
- rcu_read_lock();
for (;;) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
node = hlist_first_rcu(inodes);
- if (!node)
+ if (!node) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
break;
+ }
ei = hlist_entry(node, struct proc_inode, sibling_inodes);
spin_lock(lock);
hlist_del_init_rcu(&ei->sibling_inodes);
@@ -122,23 +124,21 @@ void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock)
inode = &ei->vfs_inode;
sb = inode->i_sb;
- if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sb->s_active))
+ if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sb->s_active)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
continue;
+ }
inode = igrab(inode);
rcu_read_unlock();
if (unlikely(!inode)) {
deactivate_super(sb);
- rcu_read_lock();
continue;
}
d_prune_aliases(inode);
iput(inode);
deactivate_super(sb);
-
- rcu_read_lock();
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
static int proc_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root)
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists