linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/sparse.c: move subsection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200220215213.GA14195@richard>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:52:13 +0800
From:   Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com, osalvador@...e.de,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com, rppt@...ux.ibm.com,
        robin.murphy@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/sparse.c: move subsection_map related codes
 together

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 04:55:59PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>On 02/20/20 at 03:12pm, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:04:20PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>> >On 02/20/20 at 02:18pm, Wei Yang wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:33:15PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>> >> >No functional change.
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> >> Those functions are introduced in your previous patches.
>> >> 
>> >> Is it possible to define them close to each other at the very beginning?
>> >
>> >Thanks for reviewing.
>> >
>> >Do you mean to discard this patch and keep it as they are in the patch 4/7?
>> >If yes, it's fine to me to drop it as you suggested. To me, I prefer to put
>> >all subsection map handling codes together.
>> >
>> 
>> I mean when you introduce clear_subsection_map() in patch 3, is it possible to
>> move close to the definition of fill_subsection_map()?
>> 
>> Since finally you are will to move them together.
>
>Oh, got it. Yeah, I just put them close to their callers separately. I
>think it's also good to put them together as you suggested, but it
>doesn't matter much, right? I will consider this and see if I can adjust
>it if v3 is needed. Thanks.

Yes, doesn't matter much.

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me