lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+8MBbKyRhipHsxb0nvV11Bvv8ypQ_gq5JR8ihfuG6JfBTnxZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:29:32 -0800
From:   Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: always use batched entropy for get_random_u{32,64}

Also ... what's the deal with a spin_lock on a per-cpu structure?

        batch = raw_cpu_ptr(&batched_entropy_u64);
        spin_lock_irqsave(&batch->batch_lock, flags);
        if (batch->position % ARRAY_SIZE(batch->entropy_u64) == 0) {
                extract_crng((u8 *)batch->entropy_u64);
                batch->position = 0;
        }
        ret = batch->entropy_u64[batch->position++];
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&batch->batch_lock, flags);

Could we just disable interrupts and pre-emption around the entropy extraction?

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ