[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLVxx6UFtv0+DcH4t7YhZ4Nmnq9DSyqPMyot=N8VFMowTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:42:08 -0800
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] driver core: Fix driver_deferred_probe_check_state()
logic
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:40 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > * If deferred_probe_timeout is not set (-1), it returns
> > -EPROBE_DEFER until late_initcall, after which it returns
> >
>
> You may want to complete the sentence here :-).
>
Yes. I somehow cut the line accidentally. Its already fixed in my tree. :)
thanks for the review!
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists