linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/sparse.c: move subsection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200220071233.GA592@richard>
Date:   Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:12:33 +0800
From:   Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com, osalvador@...e.de,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com, rppt@...ux.ibm.com,
        robin.murphy@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/sparse.c: move subsection_map related codes
 together

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:04:20PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>On 02/20/20 at 02:18pm, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:33:15PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>> >No functional change.
>> >
>> 
>> Those functions are introduced in your previous patches.
>> 
>> Is it possible to define them close to each other at the very beginning?
>
>Thanks for reviewing.
>
>Do you mean to discard this patch and keep it as they are in the patch 4/7?
>If yes, it's fine to me to drop it as you suggested. To me, I prefer to put
>all subsection map handling codes together.
>

I mean when you introduce clear_subsection_map() in patch 3, is it possible to
move close to the definition of fill_subsection_map()?

Since finally you are will to move them together.

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me