[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHS8izOumQZJw9yDLSJz8buYc8oUL8oiex8Ji62QcpTX4J6G_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:05:40 -0800
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: Sandipan Das <sandipan@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 8/9] hugetlb_cgroup: Add hugetlb_cgroup reservation tests
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:50 AM Sandipan Das <sandipan@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/02/20 3:01 am, Mina Almasry wrote:
> > The tests use both shared and private mapped hugetlb memory, and
> > monitors the hugetlb usage counter as well as the hugetlb reservation
> > counter. They test different configurations such as hugetlb memory usage
> > via hugetlbfs, or MAP_HUGETLB, or shmget/shmat, and with and without
> > MAP_POPULATE.
> >
> > Also add test for hugetlb reservation reparenting, since this is
> > a subtle issue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
> > Cc: sandipan@...ux.ibm.com
Hi folks,
Sandipan provided a Tested-by but this is more or less the only patch
in the series that is awaiting review. Can someone take a look?
Shuah, you started reviewing this months ago and I addressed the
comments. Maybe you can take another look?
Thanks in advance!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists