[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200220110427.e6jgzvdhh3ysql3n@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 12:04:27 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] tty: rename tty_kopen() and add new function
tty_kopen_shared()
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 06:17:59PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:37:58PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 02:21:13PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:15:58AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > > >
> > > > Introduce a new function tty_kopen_shared() that yields a struct
> > > > tty_struct. The semantic difference to tty_kopen() is that the tty is
> > > > expected to be used already. So rename tty_kopen() to
> > > > tty_kopen_exclusive() for clearness, adapt the single user and put the
> > > > common code in a new static helper function.
> > > >
> > > > tty_kopen_shared is to be used to implement an LED trigger for tty
> > > > devices in one of the next patches.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > > -/**
> > > > - * tty_kopen - open a tty device for kernel
> > > > - * @device: dev_t of device to open
> > > > - *
> > > > - * Opens tty exclusively for kernel. Performs the driver lookup,
> > > > - * makes sure it's not already opened and performs the first-time
> > > > - * tty initialization.
> > > > - *
> > > > - * Returns the locked initialized &tty_struct
> > > > - *
> > > > - * Claims the global tty_mutex to serialize:
> > > > - * - concurrent first-time tty initialization
> > > > - * - concurrent tty driver removal w/ lookup
> > > > - * - concurrent tty removal from driver table
> > > > - */
> > > > -struct tty_struct *tty_kopen(dev_t device)
> > > > +static struct tty_struct *tty_kopen(dev_t device, int shared)
> > > > {
> > > > struct tty_struct *tty;
> > > > struct tty_driver *driver;
> > > > @@ -1905,7 +1890,7 @@ struct tty_struct *tty_kopen(dev_t device)
> > > >
> > > > /* check whether we're reopening an existing tty */
> > > > tty = tty_driver_lookup_tty(driver, NULL, index);
> > > > - if (IS_ERR(tty))
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(tty) || shared)
> > >
> > > So here you skip initialisation and return NULL if the tty isn't already
> > > in use (e.g. is open) when shared is set.
> >
> > Which is good, right? If I remember my tests correctly this even works
> > if the tty isn't opened but just "exists".
>
> No, this means that your trigger will never be installed unless the port
> is already open, yet the sysfs interface still returns success (see
> patch 4/4 dev_store()).
Ah I think I see. tty_driver_lookup_tty() might return NULL which for
the trigger driver indicates that tty_kopen_shared should be retried,
right?
> Note that the struct tty doesn't exist until the port is opened; it's
> allocated in tty_init_dev() that you skip above when "shared" is set.
That needs fixing. I will try to resolve the dialog with Andy before
addressing that in the next iteration.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists