[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200220141637.GA3433108@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 15:16:37 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v3] clk: Use new helper in managed functions
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 03:05:54PM +0100, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 20/02/2020 12:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:04:58AM +0100, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> >
> >> Introduce devm_add() to wrap devres_alloc() / devres_add() calls.
> >>
> >> Using that helper produces simpler code, and smaller object size.
> >> E.g. with gcc-arm-9.2-2019.12-x86_64-aarch64-none-linux-gnu:
> >>
> >> text data bss dec hex filename
> >> - 1708 80 0 1788 6fc drivers/clk/clk-devres.o
> >> + 1524 80 0 1604 644 drivers/clk/clk-devres.o
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
> >> ---
> >> Differences from v2 to v3
> >> x Make devm_add() return an error-code rather than the raw data pointer
> >> (in case devres_alloc ever returns an ERR_PTR) as suggested by Geert
> >> x Provide a variadic version devm_vadd() to work with structs as suggested
> >> by Geert
> >> x Don't use nested ifs in clk_devm* implementations (hopefully simpler
> >> code logic to follow) as suggested by Geert
> >>
> >> Questions:
> >> x This patch might need to be split in two? (Introduce the new API, then use it)
> >> x Convert other subsystems to show the value of this proposal?
> >> x Maybe comment the API usage somewhere
> >> ---
> >> drivers/base/devres.c | 15 ++++++
> >> drivers/clk/clk-devres.c | 99 ++++++++++++++--------------------------
> >> include/linux/device.h | 3 ++
> >> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/devres.c b/drivers/base/devres.c
> >> index 0bbb328bd17f..b2603789755b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/base/devres.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/base/devres.c
> >> @@ -685,6 +685,21 @@ int devres_release_group(struct device *dev, void *id)
> >> }
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devres_release_group);
> >>
> >> +int devm_add(struct device *dev, dr_release_t func, void *arg, size_t size)
> >
> > Please add a bunch of kerneldoc here, as I have no idea what this
> > function does just by looking at the name of it :(
>
> Fair enough. (This was one of my "Questions" in the patch comments.)
>
> Note: My patch adds a new function, then makes use of said function.
> Is this typically done in two patches or one?
>
> Patch 1/2 augmenting the API.
> Patch 2/2 making use of the new function.
2 is usual.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists