lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:36:57 +0800
From:   Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        avri.altman@....com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        beanhuo@...ron.com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, bvanassche@....org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kuohong.wang@...iatek.com, peter.wang@...iatek.com,
        chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com, andy.teng@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] scsi: ufs: pass device information to
 apply_dev_quirks

Hi Stanley,

On 2020-02-18 15:02, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Hi Can,
> 
> 
>> Hi Stanley,
>> 
>> Is this series merged? If no, would you mind moving
>> ufshcd_vops_apply_dev_quirks(hba, card); a little bit? Like below.
>> 
>> @@ -6852,14 +6852,14 @@ static void ufshcd_tune_unipro_params(struct
>> ufs_hba *hba)
>>                  ufshcd_tune_pa_hibern8time(hba);
>>          }
>> 
>> +       ufshcd_vops_apply_dev_quirks(hba, card);
>> +
>>          if (hba->dev_quirks & UFS_DEVICE_QUIRK_PA_TACTIVATE)
>>                  /* set 1ms timeout for PA_TACTIVATE */
>>                  ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(PA_TACTIVATE), 10);
>> 
>> In this way, vendor codes have a chance to modify the dev_quirks
>> before ufshcd_tune_unipro_params() does the rest of its job.
>> 
> 
> This patch has been merged to 5.6-rc1.
> 
> Basically I am fine with your proposal. But if you need to move it to
> new mentioned position, our apply_dev_quirks callback also need
> corresponding change so it might need our co-works : )
> 
> For example, you could just post your proposed changes and then we 
> would
> provide corresponding change as soon as possible?
> 
> Besides, I would like to remind that allowing vendor to "fix" device
> quirks in advance imply that current common device quirks have some
> problems? If so, would you consider to fix common device quirks 
> instead?
> 
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Can Guo.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stanley Chu

Thanks for your cooperations on this :)

There are some failure seen with specific UFS devices on our platforms,
we can fix it with the quirk QUIRK_HOST_PA_TACTIVATE, but we are not
sure if other vendors need it or not. So we want to handle it more
carefully by limiting it to our platforms only. I had sent out that
patch weeks ago, so I will just upload the new patch as we both agreed
in that patch series.

Thanks,
Can Guo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists