[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8736b56wxe.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 17:33:17 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: apic: avoid calculating pending eoi from an uninitialized val
linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com> writes:
> From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>
> When get user eoi value failed, var val would be uninitialized and result
> in calculating pending eoi from an uninitialized val. Initialize var val
> to 0 to fix this case.
Let me try to suggest an alternative wording,
"When pv_eoi_get_user() fails, 'val' may remain uninitialized and the
return value of pv_eoi_get_pending() becomes random. Fix the issue by
initializing the variable."
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 4f14ec7525f6..7e77e94f3176 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static inline bool pv_eoi_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> static bool pv_eoi_get_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - u8 val;
> + u8 val = 0;
> if (pv_eoi_get_user(vcpu, &val) < 0)
> printk(KERN_WARNING "Can't read EOI MSR value: 0x%llx\n",
> (unsigned long long)vcpu->arch.pv_eoi.msr_val);
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
But why compilers don't complain?
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists