[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92f30e24-7b77-b21a-ed3a-efc55bc500c6@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:06:00 -0800
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: mtk.manpages@...il.com
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, david@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH] move_pages.2: Returning positive value is a new error
case
On 2/10/20 1:36 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 04-02-20 03:18:27, Yang Shi wrote:
>> Since commit a49bd4d71637 ("mm, numa: rework do_pages_move"),
>> the semantic of move_pages() has changed to return the number of
>> non-migrated pages if they were result of a non-fatal reasons (usually a
>> busy page). This was an unintentional change that hasn't been noticed
>> except for LTP tests which checked for the documented behavior.
>>
>> There are two ways to go around this change. We can even get back to the
>> original behavior and return -EAGAIN whenever migrate_pages is not able
>> to migrate pages due to non-fatal reasons. Another option would be to
>> simply continue with the changed semantic and extend move_pages
>> documentation to clarify that -errno is returned on an invalid input or
>> when migration simply cannot succeed (e.g. -ENOMEM, -EBUSY) or the
>> number of pages that couldn't have been migrated due to ephemeral
>> reasons (e.g. page is pinned or locked for other reasons).
>>
>> We decided to keep the second option in kernel because this behavior is in
>> place for some time without anybody complaining and possibly new users
>> depending on it. Also it allows to have a slightly easier error handling
>> as the caller knows that it is worth to retry when err > 0.
>>
>> Update man pages to reflect the new semantic.
>>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Hi Michael,
Would you please consider take this patch? The kernel change has been
upstreamed.
Thanks,
Yang
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>
>> ---
>> v3: * Fixed the comments from David Hildenbrand.
>> * Fixed the inaccuracy about pre-initialized status array values.
>> v2: * Added notes about status array per Michal.
>> * Added Michal's Acked-by.
>>
>> man2/move_pages.2 | 10 ++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/man2/move_pages.2 b/man2/move_pages.2
>> index 1bf1053..50c83a4 100644
>> --- a/man2/move_pages.2
>> +++ b/man2/move_pages.2
>> @@ -104,7 +104,9 @@ pages that need to be moved.
>> is an array of integers that return the status of each page.
>> The array contains valid values only if
>> .BR move_pages ()
>> -did not return an error.
>> +did not return an error. Pre-initialization of the array to the value
>> +which cannot represent a real numa node or valid error of status array
>> +could help to identify pages that have been migrated
>> .PP
>> .I flags
>> specify what types of pages to move.
>> @@ -164,9 +166,13 @@ returns zero.
>> .\" do the right thing?
>> On error, it returns \-1, and sets
>> .I errno
>> -to indicate the error.
>> +to indicate the error. If positive value is returned, it is the number of
>> +non-migrated pages.
>> .SH ERRORS
>> .TP
>> +.B Positive value
>> +The number of non-migrated pages if they were the result of non-fatal
>> +reasons (since version 4.17).
>> .B E2BIG
>> Too many pages to move.
>> Since Linux 2.6.29,
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists